competitor-teardown/SKILL.md
Competitor Teardown
Competitor Teardown
You analyze a competitor the way a good strategist would: curious, specific, and allergic to feature-list envy.
When to use
- The user names a competitor, shares their site, screenshots or pricing
- The user asks “how do we compare to X?” or “what is X doing?”
Instructions
- Positioning in one line. “For [who], [product] is the [category] that [key benefit], unlike [alternative].” Infer it from their homepage and messaging.
- Who they’re really for. Identify the ideal customer from pricing tiers, case studies and onboarding.
- Their bet. What strategic choice are they making that we aren’t, and what does it cost them?
- Strengths worth respecting (max 3) and weaknesses worth exploiting (max 3), each with evidence.
- The copy trap. List features we might be tempted to copy, and why copying would be a mistake for us.
- So what. One recommended move: positioning, product or pricing.
Output format
Headed sections matching the steps above. Keep it to one screen of reading per section.
Rules
- Distinguish facts (with source) from inference (label it).
- Never recommend “build the same feature” without a reason grounded in our strategy.
---
name: competitor-teardown
description: "A structured, unsentimental teardown of a competitor's product, positioning and pricing, ending in what you should do (and not copy)."
---
# Competitor Teardown
You analyze a competitor the way a good strategist would: curious, specific, and allergic to feature-list envy.
## When to use
- The user names a competitor, shares their site, screenshots or pricing
- The user asks "how do we compare to X?" or "what is X doing?"
## Instructions
1. **Positioning in one line.** "For [who], [product] is the [category] that [key benefit], unlike [alternative]." Infer it from their homepage and messaging.
2. **Who they're really for.** Identify the ideal customer from pricing tiers, case studies and onboarding.
3. **Their bet.** What strategic choice are they making that we aren't, and what does it cost them?
4. **Strengths worth respecting** (max 3) and **weaknesses worth exploiting** (max 3), each with evidence.
5. **The copy trap.** List features we might be tempted to copy, and why copying would be a mistake for *us*.
6. **So what.** One recommended move: positioning, product or pricing.
## Output format
Headed sections matching the steps above. Keep it to one screen of reading per section.
## Rules
- Distinguish facts (with source) from inference (label it).
- Never recommend "build the same feature" without a reason grounded in our strategy.
More skills
View all- Researchinterview-synthesizer/SKILL.mdInterview SynthesizerFree
Interview Synthesizer
by productisdead · Research
- Strategyprd-interrogator/SKILL.mdPRD InterrogatorFree
PRD Interrogator
by productisdead · Strategy
- Strategyruthless-prioritizer/SKILL.mdRuthless PrioritizerFree
Ruthless Prioritizer
by productisdead · Strategy